« Top Italian TV news reader quits | Main | Micro Persuasion: Q&A with Microsoft's Robert Scoble »

30 April 2004

EU 'behind US' in competitiveness

A study by the World Economic Forum suggests most EU countries, including those due to join on 1 May, are lagging behind the US on competitiveness. Only Finland, Denmark and Sweden ranked higher than the US among the 25 EU members (as of 1 May).
Finland, whose largest company is the mobile phone firm Nokia, scored particularly highly on information society, innovation, and networking.
The Nordic countries also scored highly on social inclusion and sustainable development.
The UK, which came fourth after the Scandinavians, scored better on liberalisation and financial services, but lower on social inclusion and innovation.
The eight measures of competitiveness were: an information society for all; innovation and R&D; liberalisation of the single market; building network industries; creating efficient financial services; improving the enterprise culture; increasing social inclusion; and enhancing sustainable development.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c532753ef00d83539bab869e2

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference EU 'behind US' in competitiveness:

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

The comments to this entry are closed.

Trevor Cook

  • Trevor is a doctoral student in politics at the University of Sydney. He also tutors in the area of Australian foreign and defence policy. He has been blogging since November 2003 and over the past decade he has written many articles on politics, public relations and social media for newspapers, magazines and websites (ABC Unleashed, Crikey, New Matilda and Online Opinion).

Google ads

Twitter Updates

    follow me on Twitter

    Your email address:


    Powered by FeedBlitz

    Search

    • Google

      WWW
      trevorcook.typepad.com
    Blog powered by TypePad
    Member since 02/2004

    Disclaimer


    • The views expressed on this site are those of the authors and commenters and not necessarily those of employers, clients and other third parties.