« A list of early PR bloggers | Main | Depressed workers can cost $10,000 »

12 October 2005

Google blogs on its issues

PRWeek US.

The corporate world's embrace of blogging has been half-hearted at best. While some companies see the potential to reach a vast array of audiences, others see blogging as merely a soapbox from which its executives can pontificate. At its worst, corporate blogging is nothing more than self-important navel gazing or is simply nonexistent.

But Google is one company that recognizes the ability of blogs to not only give the brand a voice, but to further serious policy debates. Google is no stranger to controversy, and it is now using its blogs to address those issues for which it's being criticized, among them the company's efforts to hire Kai-Fu Lee from Microsoft to run its new China R&D center, a move Microsoft has fought; a copyright case involving insurance company Geico; and The Authors Guild's lawsuit to stop Google Print, which can search the text of books.

Google's blog

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c532753ef00d8352054bb53ef

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Google blogs on its issues:

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

The comments to this entry are closed.

Trevor Cook

  • Trevor is a doctoral student in politics at the University of Sydney. He also tutors in the area of Australian foreign and defence policy. He has been blogging since November 2003 and over the past decade he has written many articles on politics, public relations and social media for newspapers, magazines and websites (ABC Unleashed, Crikey, New Matilda and Online Opinion).

Google ads

Twitter Updates

    follow me on Twitter

    Your email address:


    Powered by FeedBlitz

    Search

    • Google

      WWW
      trevorcook.typepad.com
    Blog powered by TypePad
    Member since 02/2004

    Disclaimer


    • The views expressed on this site are those of the authors and commenters and not necessarily those of employers, clients and other third parties.