« Is strategy still relevant in a social media world? | Main | Leonardo Sciascia - my new favourite author »

29 November 2007

Australia's regulatory nightmare

nstitute of Public Affairs | IPA Backgrounders Policy without Parliament: the growth of regulation in Australia.

This year, there will have been more legislation and regulation imposed in Australia than any other year in history. Furthermore, federal regulatory agencies have grown dramatically in the last decade. The budget and staff of the three major regulatory bodies - ACCC, ASIC and APRA - have nearly doubled over the last ten years.

The vastly expanding body of law and regulation not only has an economic and social impact, but also delegates increasing power to unelected regulators. Regulations, and the regulatory agencies which administer them, cast a gigantic shadow over Australia's economy and society.

All of which makes for a big challenge for Kevin Rudd and his new Minister for Finance and Deregulation, Lindsay Tanner.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c532753ef00e54f90c58c8833

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Australia's regulatory nightmare:

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

The comments to this entry are closed.

Trevor Cook

  • Trevor is a doctoral student in politics at the University of Sydney. He also tutors in the area of Australian foreign and defence policy. He has been blogging since November 2003 and over the past decade he has written many articles on politics, public relations and social media for newspapers, magazines and websites (ABC Unleashed, Crikey, New Matilda and Online Opinion).

Google ads

Twitter Updates

    follow me on Twitter

    Your email address:


    Powered by FeedBlitz

    Search

    • Google

      WWW
      trevorcook.typepad.com
    Blog powered by TypePad
    Member since 02/2004

    Disclaimer


    • The views expressed on this site are those of the authors and commenters and not necessarily those of employers, clients and other third parties.