My Photo

Trevor Cook

  • Trevor is a Sydney-based consultant who has advised many Australian organisations during the past 12 years on social media, public affairs, issues management and employee communications. He is also a phd student in politics at the University of Sydney. He writes regularly for Crikey on 'spin' and for ABC Unleashed on political and social issues. Trevor worked in government at a senior level in Canberra for nearly a decade and he has a Bachelor of Economics (honours) also from the University of Sydney. mob: 0411 222 681 trevor(dot)cook(at)gmail(dot)com skype: trevor2100

Social media guide (free)

More ads

Blog powered by TypePad
Member since 02/2004

Historical perspectives

20 March 2008

Maundy Thursday

Every year we hear dummies on the radio and elsewhere wondering out aloud about 'hey why is it called Maundy". Its actually interesting and if you're a christian pretty important. I wonder why these dopes don't ue the Internet to find answers to these questions.

Maundy Thursday - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

"Maundy Thursday" is the name for this day in England. It is therefore the usual name also in English-speaking Protestant Churches that originated in that country and even in some that originated in Scotland, although the Scottish Book of Common Prayer uses the name "Holy Thursday".[2] Other English-speaking Protestant Churches, such as the Lutheran, use both "Maundy Thursday" and "Holy Thursday".[3] Among Roman Catholics, except in England, the usual English name for the day is "Holy Thursday", in line with the name used in major Romance Languages.[citation needed]

The word Maundy is derived through Middle English, and Old French mandé, from the Latin mandatum, the first word of the phrase "Mandatum novum do vobis ut diligatis invicem sicut dilexi vos" ("A new commandment I give unto you, That ye love one another; as I have loved you"), the statement by Jesus in the Gospel of John (13:34) by which Jesus explained to the Apostles the significance of his action of washing their feet. The phrase is used as the antiphon sung during the "Mandatum" ceremony of the washing of the feet, which may be held during Mass or at another time as a separate event, during which a priest or bishop (representing Christ) ceremonially washes the feet of others, typically 12 persons chosen as a cross-section of the community.

23 February 2008

Professor Kerry Carrington and Margaret Pereira write in support of the Parramatta Memorial

The historical site of the old Parramatta Girls Home represents a significant part of Australia’s past.  It is important that the site is retained as a reminder of the horrific abuses that were committed against young girls for almost 100 years (1887-1974).  If Australia is to come to terms with the intentional and unintentional wrongs of its past it is crucial that these deeds are recognized and a commitment is made never to allow such terrible cruelty to occur again.  The proposal for the site to be made into a Living Memorial and to be redeveloped as a National Women’s Heritage Centre and National Centre for Forgotten Australians will go a long way to achieving this.

The Australian Government has shown its willingness to admit and apologize for past wrongs inflicted on Aboriginal children who were forcibly separated from their families and placed in care. Similarly, it is important that abuse committed against the children in institutions such as Parramatta Girls Home, many of whom were Aboriginal, is recognized and used as a benchmark by which we can measure progress in terms of respectful and positive change. This does not mean that the unique experiences of Indigenous people should in any way be obscured within discourse of Aborigines being just one group of people who suffered.

To make the historical site of Parramatta Girls Home into an institution for male paedophile prisoners is particularly insensitive and inappropriate considering that many of the girls who were sent to Parramatta were sexually abused inside and outside of the institution. These young women were from a variety of social and cultural backgrounds and many were forcibly removed from their families and communities and placed in institutions like Parramatta Girls School (see Carrington, 1993 for specific case studies).  Most of these girls had not committed any offence but had merely been placed in institutions under child welfare legislation, as being neglected, exposed to moral danger, homeless, or “uncontrollable”. Many had run away from home because of sexual abuse and other violence in the home, which made their lives intolerable (see Carrington, 1993 for case studies).  Putting aside the issue of paedophilia, to continue a culture of institutionalization at the PGH site is to minimize the importance of these young women’s experiences.  Their history is an uneasy, yet inseparable and critical part of Australia’s history.

The Auschwitz Museum in Germany is a memorial which is dedicated to the memory of many thousands of Jews who were murdered at the site.  This memorial stands in recognition of the tragic events that took place under Nazi rule and families are invited to participate in ceremonies which are dedicated to the memory of their relatives who died there. Auschwitz is a dreadful symbol to the whole world of what can happen and what is humanly possible.  It is also an educational memorial to visitors, students and prisoners within a philosophy of understanding the history and symbolism of the past.  Without undermining the atrocities of Auschwitz, this example illustrates how the horrors of a nation’s past can be inverted to raise awareness and educate the public.

Parramatta Girls Home can be compared with the Magdalene Laundries at the Good Shepherd Convent in Ireland where many hundreds of young women were abused and forced to perform hard labour between 1945-1970. At least 133 of these women died at the convent, many without any record of their death. The former president of Ireland Mary Robinson acknowledged the wrongs of the past by erecting a plaque in Dublin, dedicated to the women of the laundries and the children who were born from some of the women. The Magdalene Memorial Committee is now fighting for an apology from the Irish Government. 

It is the responsibility of the New South Wales and Australian governments to ensure that historical sites are preserved and the truth of their history is told.  It is important to recognize the cruel tragedies suffered by the young women of Parramatta Girls’ Home who, through no fault of their own, were confined within the walls of that institution. Then the lives of those who were so profoundly affected can begin to heal. Australians should have access to national monuments which provide opportunities for education about past atrocities, however uneasy this may cause them to feel.  This can only be achieved if sites such as Parramatta Girls’ Home are kept open to the public and the stories of those young women can be heard first hand.

Professor Kerry Carrington                    Margaret Pereira
Transitional Head of School                  Associate Lecturer
Chair in Sociology                                School of Behavioural,
School of Behavioural,                         Cognitive and Social Sciences
Cognitive and Social Sciences              University of New England
The University of New England              Armidale  NSW 2351
Armidale NSW 2351


References
Carrington, K. 1993 Offending Girls: Sex, Youth & Justice, Allen & Unwin, Sydney

Your email address:


Powered by FeedBlitz

Search

  • Google

    WWW
    trevorcook.typepad.com

Google ads

Outskirts

Parramatta Girls

Unions and Australian politics

Disclaimer


  • The views expressed on this site are those of the authors and commenters and not necessarily those of employers, clients and other third parties.