ABC Radio National - Background Briefing: 19 March� 2006� - Post-modern politics.
Paul Taaffe: By the way, just a small point: the first person that coined spin was not the media on public relations agencies, it was public relations agencies on the media, because the media, particularly in political environments, and these were political PR people, accused the media of spinning facts or statements coming out of administration. So the first time I ever heard spinning was about 20 years ago in the UK elections when the media was being accused of spinning to a conservative agenda.
The first recorded use of the term 'spin doctor' is normally identified as appearing in an article written by William Safire in the New York Times of October 21, 1984 peviewing a Reagan-Mondale US Presidential debate.
"Tonight at about 9.30, seconds after the ... debate ends a bazaar will suddenly materialise in the press room. A dozen men in good suits and women in silkdresses will circulate smoothly among reporters, spouting confident opinions. They won't be just press agents trying to import a favourable spin to a routine release. They'll be spin doctors, senior advisers to the candidates."
My source here was Key Concepts in Journalism Studies, by Bob Franklin et al (Sage, 2006).
Posted by: Philip Young | 13 April 2006 at 03:29 AM
It would be very interesting to find an academic history of the origin of the term "spin" (Paul's concern) and of the term "spin doctor" (Philip's concern). I tried an Ebsco search, but nothing.
Personally, although it's often considered a taboo word in our industry, I find myself using the term "spin" to describe the actitivites of anyone (PR, journalist, politician, activitist, CEO...) whom I personally believe is being selective with the facts.
(Philip, if your text also discusses the origin of the term "spin", please sing out.)
Posted by: Steven Noble | 13 April 2006 at 06:17 AM
Philip, could that mean that spin doctors are people who try to correct the media spin
Posted by: Trevor Cook | 13 April 2006 at 06:25 AM
Trevor's explanation of Spin and Spin Doctor seems to make pefect logical sense... funny how for years we have had a negative connotation of SD when in fact simply looking closely at the term would have given us a fairly obvious explanation.
Posted by: Simon Collister | 13 April 2006 at 06:31 PM
Bill Press in his book, Spin This!, suggests two origins - the long established usage that has its roots in weaving, spinning a yarn, and a relatively recent (US) one drawn from the idea of putting spin on a baseball pitch. As I said earlier, the first person to couple this with the word doctor was, apparently, Safire, and the application was initially limited to those who try to influence and reinterpret political messages. In some UK readings 'spin doctor' seems to be synonymous with the 'special advisers' (Jo Moore, Alastair Campbell) that characterised the rise of New Labour. From an academic perpective, Prof Betteke van Ruler of the University of Amsterdam prefers the term 'frame dctors', not as snappy but this conception certainly does apply equally to journalists as PRs. Maybe I will develop this idea on Mediations...
Posted by: Philip Young | 13 April 2006 at 07:47 PM
Yes Philip it would be good to tease this out some more.
Posted by: Trevor Cook | 13 April 2006 at 08:55 PM
You guys are probably immune, but this thread is hilarious. Really.
"Philip, could that mean that spin doctors are people who try to correct the media spin."
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Posted by: james | 01 May 2006 at 01:15 PM
Well, James, from the point of the view of anyone who is regularly subject to the willful inaccuracies and just plain stupidity and incompetence of most journalists, its simply true. The main role of any PR person is to try and get their client's view into the media rather than the journalist's interpretation (spin) of that view.
Posted by: Trevor Cook | 01 May 2006 at 01:37 PM
"The main role of any PR person is to try and get their client's view into the media rather than the journalist's interpretation (spin) of that view."
trevor!!! you gotta be on Chaser!
Posted by: james | 02 May 2006 at 07:51 PM
Chaser - no way - they're not even funny. Norman Gunston was sooo much better. The chaser's 'jokes' are so obvious. BTW do you have any ideas to contribute?
Posted by: Trevor Cook | 03 May 2006 at 05:54 AM